Health Density
Subscribe
Fitness

Push Pull Legs vs Upper Lower Split: Which Is Better?

Open notebook with a pen and glasses on a desk

Once you’ve committed to lifting weights, one of the biggest programming decisions is how to split your training, and two of the most popular options are the push/pull/legs split (PPL) and the upper/lower split. Both are proven, effective ways to organise your training, and men often wonder which is better. The answer is that it depends on your goals, schedule, and experience, each has real advantages. This guide compares push/pull/legs versus upper/lower so you can choose the right split for you.

What Each Split Is

First, a quick definition of each:

Upper/Lower split: You divide your training into upper body days (chest, back, shoulders, arms) and lower body days (legs, glutes). A typical setup is 4 days a week: upper, lower, upper, lower. Each muscle group gets trained about twice a week.

Push/Pull/Legs (PPL): You divide training into three types of days: push (chest, shoulders, triceps, the pushing muscles), pull (back, biceps, the pulling muscles), and legs (quads, hamstrings, glutes, calves). This can be run 3 days a week (each once) or 6 days a week (each twice) for more volume.

Both group related muscles together and are logical, effective structures. The key differences come down to training frequency, volume, and how many days you train.

Upper/Lower Split: Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Works well on 4 days a week: a manageable, popular frequency that fits many schedules.
  • Trains each muscle twice a week, which research supports as effective for muscle growth (training a muscle about twice weekly tends to beat once, see how often to lift after 40).
  • Good balance of frequency and recovery: each muscle gets hit twice with adequate recovery between.
  • Flexible and beginner-friendly: simpler to organise, and works well for beginners and intermediates.
  • Efficient: you can train your whole body effectively in 4 sessions.

Cons:

  • Longer, denser sessions, since you’re training your entire upper body (or lower body) in one session, upper days especially can be long with a lot to fit in.
  • Less specialisation per session: you’re covering a lot each day, so less focused volume on any single muscle group compared to PPL.
Man doing a pull-up on an outdoor bar

Push/Pull/Legs: Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Great for higher volume and frequency, especially on 6 days a week, PPL allows a lot of training volume, which can drive muscle growth for those who can recover from it. This makes it popular for more advanced lifters seeking volume.
  • Focused sessions: each day targets related muscles, allowing more focused volume per muscle group and often more manageable individual sessions (on the 6-day version).
  • Logical muscle grouping: pushing muscles work together, pulling muscles work together, which is efficient and reduces overlap.
  • Scalable: can be run 3 days (lower frequency/volume) or 6 days (high frequency/volume) depending on your availability and recovery.

Cons:

  • 6-day version is demanding: it requires training 6 days a week and recovering from that volume, which not everyone can sustain (especially with life stress, or after 40 when recovery matters more, see recovery after 40).
  • 3-day version trains each muscle only once a week, if you can only do 3 days, PPL hits each muscle just once weekly, which is generally less optimal for muscle growth than twice (the upper/lower on 4 days trains each muscle twice).
  • Can be more than beginners need: the high-volume 6-day approach may be excessive for beginners, who grow well on less.

Which Should You Choose?

The right split depends on your situation:

  • Training 3 days a week: an upper/lower (or full-body) approach often edges out 3-day PPL, because it can hit each muscle more than once. 3-day PPL trains each muscle only once weekly (see how often to lift after 40).
  • Training 4 days a week: upper/lower is an excellent, popular choice, hitting each muscle twice with good recovery. This is a great default for many men.
  • Training 5 days a week: you can do variations of either, or a hybrid.
  • Training 6 days a week (and can recover from it): PPL shines here, allowing high volume and frequency (each muscle twice). Best for those with the time and recovery capacity, often more advanced lifters.
  • Beginners: upper/lower or full-body is often ideal, simpler and effective without excessive volume. You don’t need a 6-day PPL to grow as a beginner (see building muscle after 40).
  • After 40 / limited recovery: upper/lower on 3 to 4 days often suits recovery needs better than a demanding 6-day PPL (see how often to lift after 40 and recovery after 40).

The Bigger Picture

Here’s the perspective: both splits work, and the differences matter less than the fundamentals. Whichever you choose, what drives results is consistent training, progressive overload (see progressive overload explained), adequate volume, sufficient protein (see how much protein men need), and good recovery (see sleep and muscle growth). A well-run upper/lower and a well-run PPL will both build muscle effectively. Don’t agonise over the choice, pick the one that fits your schedule and that you’ll do consistently, apply the fundamentals, and you’ll make progress. The best split is the one you’ll stick to.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is push/pull/legs or upper/lower better?

Both are effective; it depends on your goals and schedule. Upper/lower works great on 4 days, hitting each muscle twice with good recovery. PPL shines on 6 days for high volume and frequency. For 3 days, upper/lower often edges out PPL. The best is the one fitting your situation.

Which split is best for building muscle?

Both build muscle well. What matters most is training each muscle group about twice a week (which upper/lower on 4 days and PPL on 6 days both achieve), plus progressive overload, adequate volume, protein, and recovery. A 3-day PPL hits each muscle only once, which is less optimal.

Is upper/lower good for beginners?

Yes, upper/lower (or full-body) is often ideal for beginners, simpler to organise and effective without excessive volume. Beginners grow well without a demanding 6-day PPL, so a manageable 3 to 4 day upper/lower is a great starting structure.

How many days a week is push/pull/legs?

PPL can be run 3 days a week (each type once, lower frequency and volume) or 6 days a week (each type twice, high frequency and volume). The 6-day version allows more volume but is demanding to recover from; the 3-day version trains each muscle only once weekly.

Which split is best after 40?

Upper/lower on 3 to 4 days often suits recovery needs better after 40, when recovery matters more, than a demanding 6-day PPL. It hits each muscle twice with adequate recovery. If you can recover from higher volume, PPL works too, but don’t overreach on recovery.

The Bottom Line

Push/pull/legs versus upper/lower is a choice between two proven, effective training splits, and the right one depends on your schedule, goals, and recovery capacity rather than one being universally superior. Upper/lower works excellently on 4 days a week, training each muscle twice with good recovery, and is a great, flexible default for many men and beginners.

Push/pull/legs shines on 6 days a week, allowing high volume and frequency for those with the time and recovery to sustain it, often more advanced lifters, though its 3-day version trains each muscle only once weekly, which is less optimal. Match the split to your available days and recovery: upper/lower for 3 to 4 days or after 40, PPL for 6 days if you can recover from it. Ultimately, both build muscle well, and the fundamentals, consistency, progressive overload, protein, and recovery, matter far more than the split. Pick the one you’ll stick to, and get to work.

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Consult a qualified healthcare professional before starting a new exercise programme.


Sources

  1. Schoenfeld BJ et al. Effects of Resistance Training Frequency on Measures of Muscle Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sports Med, 2016
  2. Bartolomei S et al. A Comparison Between Total Body and Split Routine Resistance Training Programs in Trained Men. J Strength Cond Res, 2021
  3. Schoenfeld BJ et al. How many times per week should a muscle be trained to maximize muscle hypertrophy? A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies examining the effects of resistance training frequency. J Sports Sci, 2019
Health Density Editorial Team
Health Density Editorial Team

One email. Every Sunday. Worth opening.

The week's most useful health research, distilled into a five-minute read.

Free, every Sunday. No spam, ever.